<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Writing digitally = better self-perception of writing skills</title>
	<atom:link href="http://librarianinblack.net/librarianinblack/2009/12/writing-tech.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://librarianinblack.net/librarianinblack/2009/12/writing-tech.html</link>
	<description>Amazingly informed &#38; therefore properly opinionated.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:39:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan V</title>
		<link>http://librarianinblack.net/librarianinblack/2009/12/writing-tech.html/comment-page-1#comment-13171</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 15:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://librarianinblack.net/librarianinblack/?p=12862#comment-13171</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m all for writing and more writing - generally, the more you write, the better you get at it. That I can concur with, and I think that&#039;s a positive sign. I think it&#039;s great that kids are blogging, etc. What I take issue with is the idea that because they THINK they write better, therefore they write better. Having worked for newspapers and having been involved in numerous writing groups, I&#039;ve often seen an inverse relationship between the quality of the writing and the pride the writer takes in it. Some of the worst writers I&#039;ve ever encountered seemed to think that every word they typed was issued by the gods themselves. I mean, seriously dreadful, painfully bad stuff. And these folks wrote a lot, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m all for writing and more writing &#8211; generally, the more you write, the better you get at it. That I can concur with, and I think that&#8217;s a positive sign. I think it&#8217;s great that kids are blogging, etc. What I take issue with is the idea that because they THINK they write better, therefore they write better. Having worked for newspapers and having been involved in numerous writing groups, I&#8217;ve often seen an inverse relationship between the quality of the writing and the pride the writer takes in it. Some of the worst writers I&#8217;ve ever encountered seemed to think that every word they typed was issued by the gods themselves. I mean, seriously dreadful, painfully bad stuff. And these folks wrote a lot, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winnie</title>
		<link>http://librarianinblack.net/librarianinblack/2009/12/writing-tech.html/comment-page-1#comment-13158</link>
		<dc:creator>Winnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://librarianinblack.net/librarianinblack/?p=12862#comment-13158</guid>
		<description>I wonder how they define &quot;better&quot;. And I agree with Vickie - given that technology is not free perhaps the kids who do write &quot;better&quot; have other advantrages which have absolutley nothing to do with technology use. I am of the generation that was told television would rot our brains and I had to listen to people tell me that video games would rot my kids brains. Things are never that simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how they define &#8220;better&#8221;. And I agree with Vickie &#8211; given that technology is not free perhaps the kids who do write &#8220;better&#8221; have other advantrages which have absolutley nothing to do with technology use. I am of the generation that was told television would rot our brains and I had to listen to people tell me that video games would rot my kids brains. Things are never that simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vickie</title>
		<link>http://librarianinblack.net/librarianinblack/2009/12/writing-tech.html/comment-page-1#comment-13133</link>
		<dc:creator>vickie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://librarianinblack.net/librarianinblack/?p=12862#comment-13133</guid>
		<description>Thinking back to my stats course in library school.  I wonder if the technie kids are richer and therefore more confident and therefore rate their skills higher?  By the way, I have read a few blogs  by high school kids - and some of them are so poorly written and contain so little content of any use whatsoever that I can&#039;t see the value in it.  There are exceptions of course. 
However, having said this, I do not remain convinced by either camp - I think there are other factors at work that make kids good writers rather than their tech savvy or screen time. I read a study last year or so that said that reading to children makes little difference in their ultimate reading ability or educational success -- it found that the most important factor was the socio-economic well being/educational attainment of the parents.  So don&#039;t bother reading &quot;Night Moon&quot; to little Timmy; get yourself out there and set up a global corporation or get your MBA in night school.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thinking back to my stats course in library school.  I wonder if the technie kids are richer and therefore more confident and therefore rate their skills higher?  By the way, I have read a few blogs  by high school kids &#8211; and some of them are so poorly written and contain so little content of any use whatsoever that I can&#8217;t see the value in it.  There are exceptions of course.<br />
However, having said this, I do not remain convinced by either camp &#8211; I think there are other factors at work that make kids good writers rather than their tech savvy or screen time. I read a study last year or so that said that reading to children makes little difference in their ultimate reading ability or educational success &#8212; it found that the most important factor was the socio-economic well being/educational attainment of the parents.  So don&#8217;t bother reading &#8220;Night Moon&#8221; to little Timmy; get yourself out there and set up a global corporation or get your MBA in night school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://librarianinblack.net/librarianinblack/2009/12/writing-tech.html/comment-page-1#comment-13116</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://librarianinblack.net/librarianinblack/?p=12862#comment-13116</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t comment on the report b/c I haven&#039;t read it, but I don&#039;t necessarily agree that b/c you write alot - digitally or otherwise - you&#039;ll be a better writer. Now, if you write alot and you have someone proofing your work then I think you have a shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t comment on the report b/c I haven&#8217;t read it, but I don&#8217;t necessarily agree that b/c you write alot &#8211; digitally or otherwise &#8211; you&#8217;ll be a better writer. Now, if you write alot and you have someone proofing your work then I think you have a shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Writing digitally = better self-perception of writing skills &#124; Librarian in Black Blog – Sarah Houghton-Jan -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://librarianinblack.net/librarianinblack/2009/12/writing-tech.html/comment-page-1#comment-13107</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Writing digitally = better self-perception of writing skills &#124; Librarian in Black Blog – Sarah Houghton-Jan -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 08:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://librarianinblack.net/librarianinblack/?p=12862#comment-13107</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by John Parker, Jason Monastra. Jason Monastra said: Writing digitally = better self-perception of writing skills: Excellent article from the BBC: “Children w.. http://bit.ly/5DpQx6 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by John Parker, Jason Monastra. Jason Monastra said: Writing digitally = better self-perception of writing skills: Excellent article from the BBC: “Children w.. <a href="http://bit.ly/5DpQx6" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/5DpQx6</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

