<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 100 Alternative Search Engines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://librarianinblack.net/librarianinblack/2008/03/top-100-alterna.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://librarianinblack.net/librarianinblack/2008/03/top-100-alterna.html</link>
	<description>Amazingly informed &#38; therefore properly opinionated.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 09:03:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swiss Army Librarian &#187; On Google+ and the Role of Social Networks :: Brian Herzog</title>
		<link>http://librarianinblack.net/librarianinblack/2008/03/top-100-alterna.html/comment-page-1#comment-37046</link>
		<dc:creator>Swiss Army Librarian &#187; On Google+ and the Role of Social Networks :: Brian Herzog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 11:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://librarianinblack.net/librarianinblack/2008/03/top-100-alternative-search-engines.html#comment-37046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] important thing to remember is not to rely on one tool for everything &#8211; closed-loop social networks are good for keeping in touch with [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] important thing to remember is not to rely on one tool for everything &#8211; closed-loop social networks are good for keeping in touch with [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Houghton-Jan (LiB)</title>
		<link>http://librarianinblack.net/librarianinblack/2008/03/top-100-alterna.html/comment-page-1#comment-10411</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Houghton-Jan (LiB)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://librarianinblack.net/librarianinblack/2008/03/top-100-alternative-search-engines.html#comment-10411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for that Gary.  The invisible web does extend beyond what any engine can find, absolutely.  I strongly encourage my readers to subscribe to ResourceShelf.  I find SO much of use on your site consistently, especially in terms of online reference sources and tactics.  I can&#039;t tell you how many times I bookmark resources I find there...
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that Gary.  The invisible web does extend beyond what any engine can find, absolutely.  I strongly encourage my readers to subscribe to ResourceShelf.  I find SO much of use on your site consistently, especially in terms of online reference sources and tactics.  I can&#8217;t tell you how many times I bookmark resources I find there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gary price</title>
		<link>http://librarianinblack.net/librarianinblack/2008/03/top-100-alterna.html/comment-page-1#comment-10412</link>
		<dc:creator>gary price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://librarianinblack.net/librarianinblack/2008/03/top-100-alternative-search-engines.html#comment-10412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great post Sarah.

In my view this &quot;invisible&quot; or deep web is larger now vs. the way it was when Chris Sherman and I wrote our book seven years ago.

Yes, general web engines do index more things but there still is a massive amount that is not indexed.

Plus, and this is key, even if it is indexed by a general engine, if it does not show up in the first few results it as might as well be invisible. In other words, searcher behavior and skills haven&#039;t changed all of that much.

This is yet another reason why specialty database/engines can be so helpful and why info pros can play a huge role in making better searchers and informing the public about specialty tools.

I would also like to invite readers to visit ResourceShelf ( a site that you mention often...THANKS) where we are often posting about new and newly discovered search resources.
http://www.resourceshelf.com
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Sarah.</p>
<p>In my view this &#8220;invisible&#8221; or deep web is larger now vs. the way it was when Chris Sherman and I wrote our book seven years ago.</p>
<p>Yes, general web engines do index more things but there still is a massive amount that is not indexed.</p>
<p>Plus, and this is key, even if it is indexed by a general engine, if it does not show up in the first few results it as might as well be invisible. In other words, searcher behavior and skills haven&#8217;t changed all of that much.</p>
<p>This is yet another reason why specialty database/engines can be so helpful and why info pros can play a huge role in making better searchers and informing the public about specialty tools.</p>
<p>I would also like to invite readers to visit ResourceShelf ( a site that you mention often&#8230;THANKS) where we are often posting about new and newly discovered search resources.<br />
<a href="http://www.resourceshelf.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.resourceshelf.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
