Previous Blog Entry Next Blog Entry

Sherri Vokey lets us know of an informal survey she’s doing at UNLV to see if the students who IM regularly also use the library’s web-based chat reference service.  Of the twenty responses she’s had so far,

90% of respondents currently use IM, and 90% have never used the UNLV Chat Reference service. The next question asks "if the service were offered, would you use Instant Messaging to ask a librarian for research help?" Again, 90% responded ‘yes.’

Hmm.  Can we say "point of service" and "IM"?  Like Sherri, I would say that this points to the need to get to our patrons where they already are and on their terms.  And web-based chat services, while they have served a purpose, are proving themselves to be anything but ideal in getting our services to the patrons who need them.

“IMers not using library’s web-based chat”

  1. netbib weblog Says:

    Lieber Instant Messenger als web-basierter Chat in der Bibliothek

    Interessante, durch eine empirische Untersuchung untermauerte Argumente zur der auch hier diskutierten Frage der Vor- und Nachteile eines rein webbasierten Auskunfts-Chats versus Client-/Server-basiertem Instant Messaging (mit MSN, Yahoo, AOLs AIM oder…

Leave a Reply

LiB's simple ground rules for comments:

  1. No spam, personal attacks, or rude or intolerant comments.
  2. Comments need to actually relate to the blog post topic.