IMers not using library’s web-based chat
Sherri Vokey lets us know of an informal survey she’s doing at UNLV to see if the students who IM regularly also use the library’s web-based chat reference service. Of the twenty responses she’s had so far,
90% of respondents currently use IM, and 90% have never used the UNLV Chat Reference service. The next question asks "if the service were offered, would you use Instant Messaging to ask a librarian for research help?" Again, 90% responded ‘yes.’
Hmm. Can we say "point of service" and "IM"? Like Sherri, I would say that this points to the need to get to our patrons where they already are and on their terms. And web-based chat services, while they have served a purpose, are proving themselves to be anything but ideal in getting our services to the patrons who need them.

April 21st, 2005 at 2:00 am
Lieber Instant Messenger als web-basierter Chat in der Bibliothek
Interessante, durch eine empirische Untersuchung untermauerte Argumente zur der auch hier diskutierten Frage der Vor- und Nachteile eines rein webbasierten Auskunfts-Chats versus Client-/Server-basiertem Instant Messaging (mit MSN, Yahoo, AOLs AIM oder…